Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XPP vs YANG

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 vs Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares

XPP

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$11M

YANG

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares

Direxion Funds

Annual cost

1.03%

Fund size

$110M

Key differences

  • XPP costs 0.08% less per year.
  • YANG is significantly larger than XPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XPP is classified as cryptocurrency, while YANG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • XPP follows a leveraged strategy; YANG uses inverse.
  • Over the last 3 years, XPP has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

XPPYANG
Annual cost (TER)0.95%1.03%
Fund size (AUM)$11M$110M
Since20092009
Dividend yield2.43%3.76%
Asset classcryptocurrencyequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y-8.4%-9.4%
CAGR 3Y+5.4%-46.0%
CAGR 5Y-19.1%-35.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.31-0.34
Volatility 1Y38.82%58.29%
Max drawdown-89.90%-99.53%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XPP and YANG