Screener
YANG vs FXP
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares vs ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
Key differences
- FXP costs 0.08% less per year.
- YANG is significantly larger than FXP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FXP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| YANG | FXP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $110M | $6M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 4.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.4% | -4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | -29.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -35.0% | -17.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.34 | -0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.29% | 38.91% |
| Max drawdown | -99.53% | -94.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YANG and FXP
Explore further