Screener
XRLX vs AMAX
FundX Conservative ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- XRLX costs 0.16% less per year.
- XRLX is classified as mixed asset, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- XRLX follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XRLX | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.20% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $60M |
| Since | 2002 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.68% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -15.34% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XRLX and AMAX
Explore further