Screener
XRLX vs AOA
FundX Conservative ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 1.05% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than XRLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XRLX follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XRLX | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2002 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.68% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.09% | 10.68% |
| Max drawdown | -15.34% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XRLX and AOA
Explore further