Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XRLX vs FFOX

FundX Conservative ETF vs FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF

XRLX

FundX Conservative ETF

Fund X

Annual cost

1.20%

Fund size

$51M

FFOX

FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF

Fund X

Annual cost

1.02%

Fund size

$217M

Key differences

  • FFOX costs 0.18% less per year.
  • FFOX is significantly larger than XRLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • XRLX is classified as mixed asset, while FFOX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

XRLXFFOX
Annual cost (TER)1.20%1.02%
Fund size (AUM)$51M$217M
Since20022025
Dividend yield2.68%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+17.7%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y8.09%
Max drawdown-15.34%-12.41%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XRLX and FFOX