Screener
XT vs IBLC
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
Key differences
- XT is significantly larger than IBLC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XT is classified as equity, while IBLC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | IBLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $83M |
| Since | 2015 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +67.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +48.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.93% | 55.35% |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -62.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and IBLC
Explore further