Screener
XT vs IVV
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- IVV costs 0.43% less per year.
- IVV is significantly larger than XT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IVV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IVV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $797.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.8% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +14.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.06% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -33.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and IVV
Explore further