Screener
XT vs XOEF
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- XOEF costs 0.26% less per year.
- XT is significantly larger than XOEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | XOEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $20M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.06% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -7.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and XOEF
Explore further