Screener
XT vs IWX
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWX costs 0.26% less per year.
- IWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | IWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $3.4B |
| Since | 2015 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.8% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.06% | 10.13% |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and IWX
Explore further