Screener
XT vs IWL
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.31% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XT | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.8% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.06% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -34.41% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XT and IWL
Explore further