Screener
XTJL vs RPG
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.44% less per year.
- RPG is significantly larger than XTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XTJL is classified as alternative, while RPG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XTJL follows a structured outcome strategy; RPG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XTJL | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.3% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.64% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -23.24% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XTJL and RPG
Explore further