Screener
XTR vs CAOS
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF vs Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
- XTR costs 0.38% less per year.
- CAOS is significantly larger than XTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XTR follows a structured outcome strategy; CAOS uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, XTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CAOS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XTR | CAOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $650M |
| Since | 2021 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 17.17% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.9% | +2.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.9% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.73% | 1.52% |
| Max drawdown | -20.83% | -3.60% |
Similar to XTR and CAOS
Explore further