Screener
XTR vs RYLD
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- XTR costs 0.35% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than XTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XTR follows a structured outcome strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, XTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XTR | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 17.17% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.9% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.9% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.73% | 10.66% |
| Max drawdown | -20.83% | -41.52% |
Similar to XTR and RYLD
Explore further