Screener
RYLD vs QTR
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
- QTR costs 0.35% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RYLD follows a option income strategy; QTR uses volatility strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RYLD | QTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $3M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 11.85% | 17.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.6% | +34.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.66% | 14.14% |
| Max drawdown | -41.52% | -31.72% |
Similar to RYLD and QTR
Explore further