Screener
XTR vs XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- XTR costs 0.10% less per year.
- XYLG is significantly larger than XTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XTR follows a structured outcome strategy; XYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, XTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XTR | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $64M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 17.17% | 5.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.9% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.9% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.73% | 9.50% |
| Max drawdown | -20.83% | -21.30% |
Similar to XTR and XYLG
Explore further