Screener
XYLG vs QTR
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
- QTR costs 0.10% less per year.
- XYLG is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XYLG follows a option income strategy; QTR uses volatility strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XYLG | QTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $3M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.44% | 17.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | +34.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +25.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.50% | 14.14% |
| Max drawdown | -21.30% | -31.72% |
Similar to XYLG and QTR
Explore further