Screener
XYLD vs BKCH
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF vs Global X Blockchain ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.10% less per year.
- XYLD is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XYLD is classified as alternative, while BKCH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XYLD follows a option income strategy; BKCH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XYLD | BKCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $314M |
| Since | 2013 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +94.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +57.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.73% | 70.50% |
| Max drawdown | -33.46% | -91.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XYLD and BKCH
Explore further