Screener
YANG vs HIBL
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBL costs 0.05% less per year.
- YANG covers emerging markets markets; HIBL covers north america.
- YANG follows a inverse strategy; HIBL uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, HIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YANG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YANG | HIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $110M | $83M |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.4% | +282.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | +63.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -35.0% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.34 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.29% | 66.50% |
| Max drawdown | -99.53% | -88.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YANG and HIBL
Explore further