Screener
YANG vs XPP
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares vs ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
Key differences
- XPP costs 0.08% less per year.
- YANG is significantly larger than XPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YANG is classified as equity, while XPP is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- YANG follows a inverse strategy; XPP uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, XPP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| YANG | XPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $110M | $11M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | equity | cryptocurrency |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.4% | -8.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -35.0% | -19.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.34 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.29% | 38.82% |
| Max drawdown | -99.53% | -89.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YANG and XPP
Explore further