Screener
YBTC vs BETE
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- YBTC is significantly larger than BETE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YBTC follows a option income strategy; BETE uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| YBTC | BETE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $9M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 78.98% | 74.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | -27.3% | -26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.70% | 54.65% |
| Max drawdown | -47.09% | -56.31% |
Similar to YBTC and BETE
Explore further