Screener
YBTC vs BFAP
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF vs FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April
Key differences
- YBTC is significantly larger than BFAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YBTC follows a option income strategy; BFAP uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| YBTC | BFAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $2M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 78.98% | 22.70% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | -25.8% | -19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.71% | 21.10% |
| Max drawdown | -47.09% | -31.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YBTC and BFAP
Explore further