Screener
YBTC vs BFOC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF vs FT Vest Bitcoin Strat Floor15 ETF - Oct
Key differences
- YBTC is significantly larger than BFOC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YBTC follows a option income strategy; BFOC uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| YBTC | BFOC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $8M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 78.98% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | -25.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.71% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.09% | -17.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YBTC and BFOC
Explore further