Screener
YBTC vs MARS
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
Key differences
- MARS costs 0.20% less per year.
- YBTC is significantly larger than MARS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YBTC is classified as alternative, while MARS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- YBTC follows a option income strategy; MARS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| YBTC | MARS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $158M | $29M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 78.98% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -27.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.70% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.09% | -13.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YBTC and MARS
Explore further