Skip to content
Screener

YBTC vs RYLD

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

YBTC

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$152M

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

Both YBTC and RYLD are alternative ETFs. YBTC charges 0.95% a year and RYLD 0.60%. The main difference: RYLD costs 0.35% less per year.

  • RYLD costs 0.35% less per year.
  • RYLD is much larger than YBTC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

YBTCRYLD
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$152M$1.3B
Since20242019
Dividend yield77.86%11.65%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y-38.6%+20.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+7.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+2.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.34
Volatility 1Y39.81%10.71%
Max drawdown-48.82%-41.52%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to YBTC and RYLD