Screener
YFYA vs AOM
Yields for You Strategy A ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOM costs 1.10% less per year.
- AOM is significantly larger than YFYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YFYA follows a active selection strategy; AOM uses index tracking.
- AOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YFYA | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.25% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 5.22% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +15.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.51% | 6.58% |
| Max drawdown | -2.29% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YFYA and AOM
Explore further