Screener
YINN vs HIBL
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBL costs 0.36% less per year.
- YINN is significantly larger than HIBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YINN is classified as cryptocurrency, while HIBL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, HIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YINN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YINN | HIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.34% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $766M | $83M |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.0% | +282.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -5.5% | +63.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -37.5% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.22% | 66.50% |
| Max drawdown | -98.59% | -88.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YINN and HIBL
Explore further