Screener
YJUN vs XFLX
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- YJUN costs 0.07% less per year.
- YJUN is classified as alternative, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- YJUN follows a structured outcome strategy; XFLX uses active selection.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YJUN | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $131M | $49M |
| Since | 2021 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 9.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.8% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.88% | 3.52% |
| Max drawdown | -21.53% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YJUN and XFLX
Explore further