Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

YLD vs BINC

Principal Active High Yield ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

YLD

Principal Active High Yield ETF

Principal Funds

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$524M

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.9B

Key differences

  • BINC is significantly larger than YLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • YLD is classified as alternative, while BINC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • YLD covers global markets; BINC covers north america.
  • YLD follows a multi strategy strategy; BINC uses active selection.
  • YLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

YLDBINC
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$524M$16.9B
Since20152023
Dividend yield7.31%5.60%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategymulti strategyactive selection
CAGR 1Y+8.3%+6.3%
CAGR 3Y+8.9%N/A
CAGR 5Y+5.0%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.90N/A
Volatility 1Y4.32%2.29%
Max drawdown-28.34%-2.69%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to YLD and BINC