Screener
ZAP vs ACES
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ZAP costs 0.05% less per year.
- ZAP is significantly larger than ACES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACES has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $127M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +55.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 32.30% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -79.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and ACES
Explore further