Screener
ZAP vs CCNR
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.11% less per year.
- ZAP covers north america markets; CCNR covers global.
- ZAP follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $394M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and CCNR
Explore further