Screener
ZAP vs RNRG
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
Key differences
- ZAP costs 0.15% less per year.
- ZAP is significantly larger than RNRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZAP covers north america markets; RNRG covers global.
- RNRG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | RNRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 15.69% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -58.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and RNRG
Explore further