Screener
ZAP vs IXC
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.10% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than ZAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +53.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +20.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 18.44% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -64.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and IXC
Explore further