Screener
ZAP vs QYLD
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- ZAP costs 0.10% less per year.
- QYLD is significantly larger than ZAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZAP is classified as equity, while QYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ZAP follows a index tracking strategy; QYLD uses option income.
- QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $8.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 11.47% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.2% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.74% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and QYLD
Explore further