Screener
ZAP vs RYLD
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- ZAP costs 0.10% less per year.
- ZAP is classified as equity, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ZAP follows a index tracking strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- RYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 10.82% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and RYLD
Explore further