Screener
ZAP vs RYLG
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.15% less per year.
- ZAP is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZAP is classified as equity, while RYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ZAP follows a index tracking strategy; RYLG uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZAP | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $456M | $8M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.0% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.77% | 14.94% |
| Max drawdown | -12.38% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZAP and RYLG
Explore further