Screener
ZFEB vs LGH
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February vs HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Key differences
- ZFEB costs 0.21% less per year.
- LGH is significantly larger than ZFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; LGH uses tactical allocation.
- LGH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZFEB | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $555M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.3% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.25% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -3.00% | -29.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZFEB and LGH
Explore further