Screener
ZINC vs CZA
Zacks Income ETF vs Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- ZINC is classified as alternative, while CZA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ZINC covers global ex us markets; CZA covers north america.
- ZINC follows a active selection strategy; CZA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZINC | CZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $184M |
| Since | — | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.79% |
| Max drawdown | — | -46.18% |
Similar to ZINC and CZA
Explore further