Screener
ZOCT vs QQH
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- ZOCT costs 0.19% less per year.
- QQH is significantly larger than ZOCT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZOCT follows a structured outcome strategy; QQH uses active selection.
- QQH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZOCT | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $115M | $697M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.27% | 20.79% |
| Max drawdown | -3.18% | -41.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZOCT and QQH
Explore further