Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BTGD vs SGOL

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF vs abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

BTGD

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF

Annual cost

1.05%

Fund size

$55M

SGOL

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.17%

Fund size

$7.7B

Key differences

BTGD is an alternative ETF, while SGOL is a commodity ETF. BTGD charges 1.05% a year and SGOL 0.17%.

  • BTGD is an alternative fund, while SGOL is a commodity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • SGOL costs 0.88% less per year.
  • SGOL is much larger than BTGD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SGOL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BTGDSGOL
Annual cost (TER)1.05%0.17%
Fund size (AUM)$55M$7.7B
Since20242009
Dividend yield4.08%0.00%
Asset classalternativecommodity
Region
Strategymulti strategy
CAGR 1Y-37.2%+27.8%
CAGR 3YN/A+29.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+17.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.24
Volatility 1Y55.77%26.58%
Max drawdown-53.31%-21.56%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BTGD and SGOL