Screener
AAVM vs ASGM
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Virtus Alphasimplex Global Macro Etf
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.48% less per year.
- AAVM is significantly larger than ASGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAVM is classified as equity, while ASGM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AAVM follows a active selection strategy; ASGM uses systematic alpha.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | ASGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.86% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $8M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -6.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and ASGM
Explore further