Screener
AAVM vs ASMF
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.42% less per year.
- AAVM is classified as equity, while ASMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AAVM follows a active selection strategy; ASMF uses managed futures.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | ASMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $31M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 11.10% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -15.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and ASMF
Explore further