Screener
ASGM vs AGOX
Virtus Alphasimplex Global Macro Etf vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- ASGM costs 0.47% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than ASGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASGM follows a systematic alpha strategy; AGOX uses active selection.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASGM | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.86% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $364M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.38% |
| Max drawdown | -6.62% | -27.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASGM and AGOX
Explore further