Screener
AAVM vs XCOR
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Fundx ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.77% less per year.
- XCOR is significantly larger than AAVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XCOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | XCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 1.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $180M |
| Since | 2017 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 0.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 12.85% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -22.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and XCOR
Explore further