Screener
AAVM vs XNAV
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.89% less per year.
- AAVM is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $31M |
| Since | 2017 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and XNAV
Explore further