Screener
EEMA vs IPAC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.40% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EEMA | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.95% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -44.18% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EEMA and IPAC
Explore further