Screener
AAXJ vs EEM
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- EEM is significantly larger than AAXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAXJ covers asia pacific markets; EEM covers emerging markets.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $28.1B |
| Since | 2008 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.0% | +46.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.80% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -39.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAXJ and EEM
Explore further