Screener
AAXJ vs EWA
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Key differences
Both AAXJ and EWA are equity ETFs. AAXJ charges 0.72% a year and EWA 0.50%. The main difference: EWA costs 0.22% less per year.
- EWA costs 0.22% less per year.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | EWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | +5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.53% | 17.19% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -45.54% |
Similar to AAXJ and EWA
Explore further