Screener
EWA vs EEMA
iShares MSCI Australia ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both EWA and EEMA are equity ETFs. EWA charges 0.50% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: EWA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- EWA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EEMA covers emerging markets.
- Over the last three years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWA | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Since | 1996 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.2% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.19% | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -45.54% | -44.18% |
Similar to EWA and EEMA
Explore further