Screener
AAXJ vs IEMG
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.63% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than AAXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAXJ covers asia pacific markets; IEMG covers emerging markets.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $151.2B |
| Since | 2008 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.0% | +44.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.80% | 19.02% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -38.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAXJ and IEMG
Explore further