Screener
AAXJ vs SCZ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both AAXJ and SCZ are equity ETFs. AAXJ charges 0.72% a year and SCZ 0.40%. The main difference: AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; SCZ covers global markets excluding the US.
- AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; SCZ covers global markets excluding the US.
- SCZ costs 0.32% less per year.
- SCZ is much larger than AAXJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $14.9B |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 2.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.53% | 14.68% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -41.07% |
Similar to AAXJ and SCZ
Explore further